Just flat sick and twisted.

Here's how the human shadow works: you take a deep fear, a fear you can't stand to acknowledge, something you're ashamed of, your worst fear, and then you project it out onto the "other" so you can accuse them of carrying out your actions.

Is Obama really responsible for our national debt, as the $7 million ad, paid for by Crossroads Group and now appearing on TV, charges?

Or, are the very people paying for the ad actually responsible for our national debt?

Let's reprise, folks. The national budget was balanced, had a bit of a cushion in fact, when Bill Clinton stepped down and George Bush Jr took over.

Then, during Jr's administration, the debt began to blossom. First there were tax cuts, mostly benefiting those who were already quite wealthy (wealthy enough to help him win elections, anyway). Then there was more deregulation of banking and lending (which started under Reagan, another Republican), until big money got so complicated no one knew what was going on.

Then we got into not 1 but 2 unfunded wars, Iraq and Afghanistan. Unfunded… that means not paid for in the regular budget. That means paid for by borrowing. Unfunded. That means your national debt begins to balloon and swell out of control.

Then finally, just a few months before he left office, Jr enacted a huge emergency bailout, as our whole economy began to implode under the weight of 8 long years of catchily-phrased-but-poorly-thought-out Republican policies.

FOR PETE'S SAKE, AMERICA – WAKE THE FRACK UP!!

Did Obama really step into a peaceful, orderly land of plenty and then begin to maliciously max out the USA's charge cards for no good reason?

The worse Republican policies work, the harder Republicans try to blame the effects of those policies on Democrats. 

This isn't governing. Or wisdom. Or patriotism. Not even the rah-rah-Tea-Party-foam-at-the-mouth kind of patriotism.

This is wrong. Just flat sick and twisted.

This is a childish failure to take resonsibiity for one's own actions, played out at a national level, for very big stakes.

This is "doublethink" and "newspeak," just like George Orwell predicted in 1984.

This is the way down.

Have we finally made it to 1984?

DOUBLETHINK

Stirring up hatred for the "others"…

being-dismissive-to-downright-lying about your opponent's policies and ideas…

saying the exact opposite of what is actually happening and true…

 

NEWSPEAK

Creating catchy soundbite "solutions" when you know they would never actually work…

relying on jingles rather than judgement…

using archetypal words (homeland, freedom, liberty, etc) to stir unconscious passions…

Are we going backwards? Have we finally made it all the way back to George Orwell's 1984?

Dis-satisfaction is a necessary precursor to satisfaction

More thoughts provoked by hanging out with a baby…

Willy wore himself out yesterday trying to get up on all fours, and trying to get to the toys I'd placed so provocatively near, and trying to sit up.

When I laid him down on his back on the play pad he'd hold his head and shoulders off the floor, trying to get back up. You know how hard that is? Like the first part of a sit-up? Wow. What a lot of work it is to grow up!

It made me think about how dissatisfaction fuels human development. If we weren't dissatisfied with lying around, we'd never start rolling over. If we weren't bored with rolling over, we'd never get up on all fours. If we didn't get annoyed by having to crawl everywhere, we'd never learn how to walk.

Dis-satisfaction is a necessary precursor to satisfaction.

Shameless

Most of us would feel something between sheepish to completely mortified if we threw up in front of someone else. Not this guy. This guy is shameless.

So when he stops eating and starts wiggling today –which I know by now is not a good sign– I sit him up, and yup, Willy hurls. I mean, hurls.

I'm holding one of those 50 cent IKEA towels up in front of him, and he just fills that sucker. So I'm sitting there holding a towel full of vomit, plus it's all over my left arm and all over the receiving blankets I've draped over the chair, but before I can even move, Willy — with stuff still dribbliing out of his mouth and rolling down his chin — turns to me and gives me a peaceful, heartwarming, absolutely beneficent smile.

I laughed till I cried. Oh, what bliss! To be 16 weeks old and shameless! To have no concept of "wrong," "bad," "uncool," or "improper." To not be embarrassed or ashamed of anything your body does as it goes about its appointed tasks.

In A Little Book on the Human Shadow, (HarperSan Francisco, 1988, page 17-18) Robert Bly uses stuffing a bag as a metaphor for what inevitably happens to our shadows as we grow older:

"When we were one or two years old we had what we might visualize as a 360-degree personality. Energy radiated out from all parts of our body and all parts of our psyche. A child running is a living globe of energy. We had a ball of energy, all right; but one day we noticed that our parents didn't iike certain parts of that ball. They said things like" "Can't you be still?" Or "It isn't nice to try and kill your brother." Behind us we have an invisible bag, and the part of us our parents don't like, we, to keep our parents' love, put in the bag. By the time we go to school our bag is quite large. Then our teachers have their say: "Good children don't get angry over such little things." So we take our anger and put it in the bag. By the time my brother and I were twelve in Madison, Minnesota, we were knows as "the nice Bly boys." Our bags were already a mile long.

"Then we do a lot of bag stuffing in high school. This time it's no longer the evil grownups that pressure us, but people our own age… I lied all through high school automatically to try to be more like the basketball players… out of a round globe of energy the twenty-year-old ends up with a slice. We'll imagine a man who has a thin slice left –the rest is in the bag– and we'll imagine that he meets a woman. Let's say they are both twenty-four. She has a thin, elegant slice left. They join each other in a ceremony, and this union of two slices is called a marriage. Even together the two do not make up one person!"

Then Bly goes on to say that since we spend the first halves of our lives putting stuff into the bag, to ever grow up we have to spend the second halves of our lives choosing what to pull back out of the bag. We have to do what everybody wants us to do when we're children, to belong to a culture. Then we have to go our own way later, to turn into individuals who can each think, create and contribute in their own way.

I'm feeling pretty delighted to be hanging out with someone who can still radiate in all 360 degrees. Thanks for your sunshine, Willy!

 

 

 

 

 

Just like now

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way — in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only."

The opening paragraph of A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens, describing the year 1775

 

 

Playing our roles

The enchantments and bewitchments which occur over and over again in fairy tales are reminders. Warnings. Because we're all enchanted at one time or another. We mis-understand the stories. We glorify one type of role to the extent that we think we’re supposed to be Beauty, or be a hero, then we stick ourselves into that role and try not to be anything else.

We just flat get stuck. In the process of trying to fit into our appointed role—athlete or honor student or family man or class clown or skinny woman or powerful businessman or laidback dude or hardened gang member or devoted disciple—we deny the very existence of any part of ourselves that doesn’t fit neatly into that role. We deny we have any desire to skip class, or eat the whole bag of cookies, or blow off work today, or hop into bed with a total stranger.

And we usually can manage to cram all those contrary desires way down into our shadows. {What contrary desires? I don’t see any.} That is, until we wake up one day and find ourselves doing something really stupid and totally “out of character.” Out of character… out of the role we’ve chosen—or were told—to play. Which was probably a fairy tale character’s role, from a fairy tale family, in a fairy tale setting, and not humanly possible in the first place. It’s sad and poignant—as well as poisonous and highly paradoxical—that despite the evil increasing exponentially around the world, most of us are trying so hard to be good.

Denying parts of your psyche on a daily basis is called repression, and it creates another ongoing problem called regression. If I can’t even admit I have certain feelings—if they shame me, or they scare me, or if they’re not permitted in my culture—those feelings will not look the same when they slip past my conscious guard years later. Those feelings will have regressed.

Re-gress is the opposite of pro-gress. To regress is “to go backwards.” The parts of myself I just can’t stand to think about will get less human the longer I refuse to acknowledge them. The longer I pretend not to know anything at all about some part of myself, about some basic instinctual impulse of mine, the grosser and coarser and hairier and wilder that abandoned part of myself is going to get — like a troll living under a bridge, or a castaway all alone on an island.

What makes a bunch of good ole boys who usually hang out down at the café go out and lynch a black man? Or beat a gay man to death and leave his body dangling from a barbed wire fence? What makes one commuter pull out a gun and shoot another commuter over an insignificant driving mistake? Who does the actual torturing in a torturous regime? Were these people all born evil?

No. No one is born evil. However, we are all capable of a distinct downward slide as we move through life… from re-pression to re-gression to ag-gression.

Whenever we try to appear angelic on the surface, the devil inside dances.

As soon as we get really certain that our way is the only way, imps start to grin.

If we can’t admit being wrong… can’t calmly discuss important issues… simply won’t tolerate other points of view, much less change our minds faced with new evidence… when we are obviously much cooler and smarter, and other people are obviously much lamer and dumber… we are bewitched, folks. Self-enchanted. Firmly stuck in a fairy tale role.

And there's only one way to break such a spell: to take off the mask. To face the fact that every person on earth—you, me, and the guy in the corner booth over there—is just as much Court Jester as Wise King, just as much Wicked Witch as Snow White.

To go ahead and admit we're not always perfect, so we can start to do something toward mending our mistakes.

–from Shadow in the USA, p 62-63

Falsehood is so easy…

Falsehood is so easy, truth so difficult…
Examine your words well, and you will find that even when you have no motive to be false, it is a very hard thing to say the exact truth, even about your own immediate feelings — much harder than to say something fine about them which is not the exact truth.
-George Eliot, in Adam Bede

Hate has a lot in common with love…

Hate has a lot in common with love, chiefly with that self-transcending aspect of love, the fixation on others, the dependence on them, and in fact the delegation of a piece of one's own identity to them… the hater longs for the object of his hatred. –Vaclav Havel

 

Projection of shadow material causes most of the misery, injustice and warfare in the world. –Robert Bly

Learning to integrate shadow material is the single most important task facing mankind, as failure to do so will lead to the extinction of the human race. –Carl Jung