There’s No Such Thing As A Reliable Narrator

Nobody qualifies as a reliable narrator. Not when they’re telling their own story. We all have vast egos to protect, and even vaster shadows to protect them with. All any of us can do is try to be a reliable narrator.

When I’m asked by someone new about my own personal history (careers, moves, marriages, divorces), I find I have to really slow down and search my heart to keep from dropping into the “good guy, bad guy” mode as soon as I open my mouth. And probably still do so even when I’m trying not to.

We all want to be the hero of our own story, no doubt about it.

But even more than that, we want for someone else to be the villain.

Chap 2 Full Page

On beliefs and beheadings

This is from the introduction to The Case for God, by Karen Armstrong, published in 2009:

“During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, a time that historians call the early modern period, Western people began to develop an entirely new kind of civilization, governed by scientific rationality and based economically on technology and capital investment. Logos achieved such spectacular results that myth was  discredited and the scientific method was thought to be the only reliable means of attaining truth. This would make religion difficult, if not impossible. As theologians began to adopt the criteria of science, the mythos of Christianity were interpreted as empirically, rationally, and historically verifiable and forced into a style of thinking that was alien to them. Philosophers and scientists could no longer see the point of ritual, and religious knowledge became theoretical rather than practical. We lost the art of interpreting the old tales of gods walking the earth, dead men striding out of tombs, or seas parting miraculously. We began to understand concepts such as faith, revelation, myth, mystery, and dogma in a way that would have been very surprising to our ancestors. In particular, the meaning of the word “belief” changed, so that a credulous acceptance of creedal doctrines became the prerequisite of faith, so much so that today we often speak of religious people as “believers,” as though accepting orthodox dogma on “faith” were their most important activity.

This rationalized interpretation of religion has resulted in two distinctively modern phenomena: fundamentalism and atheism. The two are related. The defensive piety popularly known as fundamentalism erupted in almost every major faith during the twentieth century. In their desire to produce a wholly rational, scientific faith that abolished mythos in favor of logos, Christian fundamentalists have interpreted scripture with a literalism that is unparalleled in the history of religion. In the United States, Protestant fundamentalists have evolved an ideology known as “creation science” that regards the mythoi of the Bible as scientifically accurate.  They have, therefore, campaigned against the teaching of evolution in the public schools, because it contradicts the creation story in the first chapter of Genesis.” –Karen Armstrong, The Case for God, p. XV in hard back edition

And of course, we now have Islamic “believers” on the other side of the world bombing and  beheading those who disagree with their beliefs. Ouch.

During the recent “Cosmos” series on TV, the narrator pointed out that we are only 400 years away from the first time anyone looked at the stars through a telescope. 400 years. That is no time, evolutionarily speaking, since everyone thought that the world was flat and that a God who lived up in the sky would send them to either heaven or hell when they died (or reincarnate them after death). It’s certainly (and obviously) not enough time for most people on the planet to adapt their thinkings and imaginings to a universe far more vast, intricate and impersonal than their elders could have ever imagined.

Thus we all find ourselves caught in the pincers of a dying scorpion: last-gasp, backward-yearning, earth-centric thinking. And the clearer it becomes that its beliefs are not based on reality, the more violently will this dying scorpion thrash around. Ouch.

weapons-and-ammo

 

 

It’s not working, folks…

bottles-of-pills

Never before have so many been on anti-depressants and other mind altering drugs, and never before have so many been depressed and/or acted crazier.

Maybe it’s time to realize that mood altering drugs are just another category of products that are not being pushed onto us ‘for our own good,’ as they always say, but for the benefit of some very big corporations’ very voluminous bottom lines.

Did any of the numerous drugs he took during his lifetime help Robin Williams? or Philip Seymour Hoffman?

Watch THX, George Lucas’ first movie.

We don’t need to deaden ourselves to what’s happening in our world.

We need to wake up and change our world before it’s too late.

sheep-people

Robin Williams

We never know what sorrows and demons live behind another person’s persona.

I try not to judge. Just to grieve.

What a brightly burning light Robin Williams had! Which means he had just as great a darkness within.

And didn’t know how to reconcile the two.

half-jester-half-king-mask

Where DO our ideas come from?

“Stepan Arkadyevitch took in and read a liberal paper, not an extreme one, but one advocating the views held by the majority. And in spite of the fact that science, art, and politics had no special interest for him, he firmly held those views on all these subjects which were held by the majority and by his paper, and he only changed them when the majority changed them–or, more strictly speaking, he did not change them, but they imperceptibly changed of themselves within him.

Stepan Arkadyevitch had not chosen his political opinions or his views; these political opinions and views had come to him of themselves, just as he did not choose the shapes of his hat and coat, but simply took those that were being worn… If there was a reason for  his preferring liberal to conservative views, which were held also by many of his circle, it arose not from his considering liberalism more rational, but from its being in closer accordance with his manner of life.” –from Anna Karenina, by Leo Tolstoy

 

“Lydgate did things in an episodic way, much as he gave orders to his tailor for every requisite of perfect dress, without any notion of being extravagant… it had never occurred to him that he should live in any other way than what he would have called an ordinary way… he walked by hereditary habit… –from Middlemarch, by George Eliot

sheep-people

 

 

Ashamed to be human

lynchingI watched Twelve Years A Slave last night. Which I’d been putting off, because I knew it would throw me for a loop. And it did.

While there’s some comfort in being able to sob during a horribly upsetting movie in the privacy of my own home, it does bring up the fact that slaves had no privacy whatsoever to do their grieving in. And that refugees from war and abused people and homeless people and people who roam the streets because they just don’t have enough mental competency to hold a job still have no privacy whatsoever to do their grieving in.

Way back when he was in middle school my son Tim came home one day, threw himself into a chair, threw his back pack down onto the floor, and said, “I’m ashamed to be white.”

Yup. Got it. It’s hard to look squarely at our country’s history — at any imperialistic country’s history — and realize that the way of life one takes for granted is based on the pain and suffering of so many others, both past and present. [Books you need to read:  A People’s History of the United States, by Howard Zinn, and Overthrow, America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq, by Stephen Kinzer]

But we can’t stop looking. It’s absolutely necessary to look. It’s absolutely necessary if human consciousness is going to develop any further. The way the human shadow affects the ego, we can’t do anything about the evil around us until we begin to see the evil in our own hearts, until we can start making the connections between “out there” and “in here.”

I’ve heard holocaust survivors say that part of “survivor’s guilt” is living with what they had to do to survive. Maybe you helped get others ready for the ovens, or stole food, or turned someone else in. Maybe it’s just that you had to stand by while so many others perished. In Twelve Years A Slave, the principal character Northrup has to stand by and try to show no emotion while other slaves are beaten, sexually abused, lynched, and oppressed in every conceivable way, which probably ate into his soul even more than the horrors done to him personally. Nor can he take any of the other slaves with him when he’s finally released.  He has to walk off and leave them to their fate, which he knows his release is going to worsen. Northrup dealt with his “survivor’s guilt” by writing a book, by becoming an instrumental part of the underground railway for runaway slaves, and by spending the rest of his life working toward the abolishment of slavery.

But how do I deal with my survivor’s guilt? There are so many things to feel guilty about now. How is one single soul supposed to cope? Human beings fuck up — and fuck one another up, and fuck their environments up — on such a regular basis that anything positive someone does manage to accomplish gets sucked down and completely buried in the general madness.

My son’s statement all those years ago no longer goes far enough for me.

These days, I’m not just ashamed to be white.

I’m ashamed to be human.
caveman

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feeling burned out?

Me too. Everybody else too. Burned out and bad news-ed to death.

It’s one result of being alive during a tsunami of information and technological innovation and cutthroat profit making.

person-in-cubicle

Each of our poor Psyches has to find its way every day through mountains of opinions disguised as facts; through vast deserts where every grain of sand is an advertisement for a new product while actual product satisfaction fades like a mirage on the horizon; where no sooner do we figure out how to arrange our facebook page than the proprietors change the whole format; where no matter how many hours we work we still worry about money, about whether or not we can afford to live. Now isn’t that a weird thought? Whether we can afford to live…?

Yet the basic equipment we have for filtering data and processing change is no better than the equipment our hunting/gathering ancestors had living in small, stable communities. The raw mechanics of a human being — the brain, the nervous system, the circulatory system, the digestive system, the muscles, the bones, the psychic relationship between conscious and unconscious knowledge — don’t change quickly. Can’t change quickly. The raw mechanics of being human take thousands of generations to change.

So while we think of ourselves as ultra modern — sporting the absolute latest and fastest sort of phone — we often find ourselves acting like cavemen.

caveman

Or, feeling completely exhausted and overwhelmed. Over-whelmed. Whelmed-over.

Perhaps it’s inevitable, as Robert Bly speculated one time during a lecture on the human shadow. Perhaps with each technological advance there’s a necessary and corresponding spiritual loss. Perhaps each conscious gain has to push out some older unconscious entity, like knowing which plants are poisonous, in order to gain a toehold.

Who knows? What we do know is that microwaves cook so fast we get impatient if it takes two minutes to boil water. We do know we can connect ourselves to the whole world via the internet, as long as we focus on the monitor and don’t look around the room we’re in. We do know we can walk down the street or drive a car while talking to someone miles away, but only if we ignore the people right there in front of us.

Ach… I fear that unless we’re very careful from here on out, each technological advance will only make us more impatient with each living breathing moment; will only take us farther away from the here and now which our instinctual human natures call home.

icarus-falling

Perfectly Flawed

Just finished one of Wallace Stegner’s novels, The Big Rock Candy Mountain. My god that man could express the human condition. 

And thought, as I walked along in the woods later, that the best a human being can be is perfectly flawed.
We can’t keep from making mistakes. And denying our mistakes only harms others.
So what can be done?
We can stop trying to cover our mistakes up. Or glossing them over, or blaming them on someone else.
We can start trying to realize that the best of us are, at our best, perfectly flawed.
We can start trying to take responsibility for our flaws as openly as we flaunt our perfections.
 the-Beast
 european-saint

Buncha Liars

masks

“My dear, I have lied all my life. I never spoke for the sake of truth, only for my own sake, and although I always knew it, I only really see it now… Ah, and all the rest — savez-vous, it is possible that I’m lying even now; indeed, I’m quite sure I am. The main trouble is that I believe myself even while I’m lying. The most difficult thing in life is to live without lying and — and not to believe in one’s own lies.” — Stepan Verkhovensky speaking, in The Possessed, by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

“Sometimes I lie, and sometimes I tell the truth. I just don’t know which is which.” — Robert Bly, while lecturing on the human shadow

half-jester-half-king-mask

And ain’t it the truth about us all…

“I, I, I…”

From The Years, by Virginia Woolf:

“… My people, he was saying… Her attention wandered. She had heard it all before.

I, I, I — he went on. It was like a vulture’s beak pecking, or a vacuum-cleaner sucking, or a telephone bell ringing. I, I, I. But he couldn’t help it, not with that nerve-drawn egotist’s face, she thought, glancing at him. He could not free himself, could not detach himself. He was bound on the wheel with tight iron hoops. He had to expose, had to exhibit. But why let him? she thought, as he went on talking. For what do I care about his “I, I, I”?  Let me shake him off then, she said to herself, feeling like a person whose blood has been sucked, leaving all the nerve-centres pale. She paused. He noted her lack of sympathy. He thought her stupid, she supposed.

“I’m tired,” she apologized. “I’ve been up all night,” she explained. “I’m a doctor — ”

The fire went out of his face when she said “I.” That’s done it — now he’ll go, she thought. He can’t be “you” — he must be “I.”

And then she smiled. For up he got and off he went… ”

The Years, Virginia Woolf, Harcourt paperback, 1965, p. 361.

eagle-at-podium